Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM +907%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro Remote
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy