Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD FirePro RG220A vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XT +28700%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2010
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro Remote
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

M93
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy