Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +392%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
65W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Oland
Orthrus
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy