Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD FirePro S9000 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD FirePro S9000
VS
NVIDIA PG506 242
AMD FirePro S9000
NVIDIA PG506 242
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +219%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
165W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA100
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy