Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +214%
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tobago
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy