Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +1638%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
2816
Shading Units
18176
176
TMUs
568
64
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
AD102
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy