Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +93%
5.238 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GA107
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy