Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +378%
5.238 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
384
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU117
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy