Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 5050 +61%
12.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2025
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.90 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
GB207
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
GB207
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
0 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
596 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
9.1
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy