Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +3%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro
Generation
Console GPU(ASUS)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
LPDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Phoenix
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy