Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (215W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +1577%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
215W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
R600
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy