Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +755%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4750
0.934 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2009
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.68 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
934.4 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
186.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
RV740
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
RV740 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy