Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +556%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
10
4096
Shading Units
640
256
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
80W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy