ATI FirePro V3700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+4351%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
40
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
TU106
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
