ATI FirePro V3700 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
+13340%
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Fiji
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8
(215-0862040)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
