Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc A310

ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +416%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
DG2-128
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy