Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 55W)
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 +37%
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
512
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy