Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 480

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 480

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 480 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 480 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 480 +1021%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2016
FirePro
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
2304
20
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 XT (215-0876184)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy