Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FireGL V8600

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +41%
0.624 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
159W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
R600
Turks GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy