Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +71%
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jul 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
112
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
G92B
Turks GL
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy