Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 4550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 10.48GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +550%
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4550
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
655 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
10.48GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
80
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV710
Turks GL
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy