Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (74W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +65%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
GM206
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy