Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro V5900 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD FirePro V5900 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +287%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
DG1
Cayman LE WS
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
Unknown
389 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy