Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 76W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750 +1037%
0.512 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

76W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GT218
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy