CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
VS
ATI FirePro V7900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
+60%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
VS
GeForce GTX 1650
Graphics Card
May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cayman
GPU Name
TU117
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
2
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM
3
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
4
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
5
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
6
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro RG220
7
ATI FirePro V7900 vs Intel Xe DG1
8
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
9
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
10
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
Related News
1
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
2
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
3
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
4
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
5
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
6
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
7
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
8
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
9
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
10
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy