Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +48%
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Lexa
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy