Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300 +68%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy