Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

ATI FirePro V8700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 151W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +137%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jul 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
108.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
800
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
TU116
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy