Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

ATI FirePro V8750 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8750
1.2 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +183%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

151W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy