Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +1057%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1600
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

208W
TDP
143W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
G80
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy