Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

ATI FirePro V8800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +881%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1600
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
28
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

208W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
G80
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy