Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +340%
2.64 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

208W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Oland
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy