Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +106%
1.267 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cayman
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy