Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +103%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G92B
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy