Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

AMD FirePro W4000 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +339%
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
3
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.212 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.212 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.5 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
R600
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy