Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3690

AMD FirePro W4300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 26.56GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +232%
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3690
0.429 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
830 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
26.56GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.72 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
428.8 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
RV670
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy