Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5100 vs Intel Arc A750

AMD FirePro W5100 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W5100 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5100
1.428 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +1104%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
DG2-512
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy