Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2034MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600M +341%
7.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1224 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
SM Count
66
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Navi 23
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy