Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +206%
6.05 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1185 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1477 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
896
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.26 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.10 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.050 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GA107
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
160 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy