Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe +9%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Baffin
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
3 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy