Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +355%
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1280
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU102
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy