Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000 +528%
2.432 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1280
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G92B
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy