Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +1967%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G94B
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy