Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1

AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +3257%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2816
Shading Units
48
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
29W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GF119
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy