Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +639%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2816
Shading Units
240
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
204W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT200B
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy