Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +749%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2020
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
85W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy