Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Vega Frontier Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition +992%
13.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1382 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
409.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.21 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.11 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
819.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX AIR
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy