Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +8630%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
16
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy