CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 210
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
+8630%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
VS
FirePro S10000 Passive
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
16
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
31W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
2
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
3
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
4
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT
6
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
7
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
8
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
9
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
10
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy