Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel HD Graphics 4200

NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel HD Graphics 4200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel HD Graphics 4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock850MHz
112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (4W vs 23W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 4200 +198%
0.272 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2013
GeForce 300M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
850 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
160
16
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.700 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
272.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
68.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
4W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

C89
GPU Name
Haswell GT2
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 7.5
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
22 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy