Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
1784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +14845%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.23GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.116 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
2.116 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

13W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Amethyst
G98-700-U2
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5 billion
80 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy